So you accept acceptance in Christianity and Christian canon (and accordingly in the axial amount of Jesus / Christ). How so, and why? Everything accept to be advised and questioned. Everything is affair for the mill. Annihilation is sacred.
Table of Contents:
General Observations and Comments
The Second Coming
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS and COMMENTS
The Reality of Christ and Accordingly of Christianity: Accurate or False?
*First and foremost, you weren’t there all those 2000+ years ago. All you apperceive and accept is buzz and are just a amount of claims fabricated from 2000 years ago by appealing abundant the abundant army of the times. It’s all somebody told somebody told somebody.
*If there is any one affection that defines the animal breed is that we adulation cogent alpine tales. We are acutely hardwired to be storytellers. Anticipate of the in fact millions of novels, abbreviate stories, plays, poems, bivouac tales, TV shows / episodes, films, operas, even added beheld forms of storytelling like paintings, cartoons – the account is about endless. That affection goes aback tens of bags of years if you anticipate of those cavern art paintings in Europe or Australia. Even belief that accept a atom of accurateness in them are decumbent to exaggeration, abnormally with retellings. Biblical belief tend to be just that – stories. The complete Bible is in fact just an album of quasi-connected alpine tales.
*Since it is in fact simple to authorize a religion, as is axiomatic by how abounding altered religions accomplished and present abide or accept existed, the acceleration of Christianity is annihilation historically special.
*None, not one of the supernaturally themed contest affiliated to or with Jesus can be historically accepted or complete by any complete absolute (i.e. – non-Biblical) antecedent material(s).
*There are no aboriginal antecedent abstracts available, just copies of copies and translations of translations. Further, these copies of copies and translations of translations were all handwritten and duke transcribed copies of copies and translations of translations. Errors, accessory and major, are apprenticed to accept crept in.
*Witnesses generally accept hidden agendas and beholder affidavit isn’t consistently reliable as has been generally accurate in courts of law and in attitude classes. That of advance aswell included the assemblage to Biblical contest as accompanying in that angelic book.
*All images of Jesus are just aesthetic inventions. Nobody in fact has a clue.
*If analysis are annihilation to go by is that Jesus should accept been built-in a changeable aback Joseph had no complete accession to the analysis inherent in Jesus.
*There are abundant complete pieces of that one Accurate Cross in actuality to clean Noah’s (fictional) Ark. And if anamnesis serves, there are almost four or 5 accurate Spears in actuality in assorted churches and museums about the apple anniversary claiming to be THE Spear (John 19: 34). And Allah abandoned knows area the Angelic Grail resides – just apparently in the minds of the Accurate Believers. Otherwise, to rational humans it’s just accession allegorical religious artefact.
*The Shroud of Turin has been accurate by radioactive / carbon-14 dating to be a complete (albeit it able-bodied done) forgery.
*The four Gospels don’t even accede on what happened and if it happened and in what adjustment things happened and who saw what happened.
*Not all Abreast and Middle Eastern, Christian religious and age-old Biblical history academics accede that even a bitter flesh-and-blood Jesus existed, far beneath a abnormal Jesus, admitting I’m accommodating to accord the account of the agnosticism on that one. I’ll accede that an complete bitter animal being, declared Jesus, existed area and if he is said to accept existed some 2000 years ago.
*Nobody has a clue or any complete abstraction who the authors of the Gospels were. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were just names invented by and assigned to these texts by age-old abbey officials.
*The Gospels weren’t originally bound until 40 to 70 years after-the-fact. What ability that advance in agreement of accurateness of the contest described?
*While you get hundreds of “Jesus said” quotes, no scribe(s) accept been anytime articular who was anxious or answerable with autograph down his statements on the atom and in complete time. Further, there are times and places area no scribes could accept been present and yet we still somehow apperceive what “Jesus said”.
*When it comes down to his own ego, Jesus has no ancestors ethics (Matthew 10: 34-38) and his image, Revelation aside, that Jesus is a lover and not a fighter is incorrect (Matthew 10: 34).
*There’s abandoned a 1 in 365.25 adventitious that Jesus was built-in on the 25th of December. This date was just accession fiction invented by those age-old abbey officials.
*The complete amount of astute men at the Nativity isn’t in fact defined adverse to accepted opinion. It’s just affected to be three aback there were three ability (all in fact clashing for a cast new baby).
*The “star” of Bethlehem couldn’t accept been a angelic article and accordingly can abandoned be admired as a bona-fide UFO accident – or a complete plan of fiction aback the “star” abandoned is accompanying in just one Gospel. The abandoned argument that mentions this is in Matthew 2.
*There was an astronomically absurd solar ‘eclipse’ associated with the beheading event. Is this yet accession archetype of added fabricated up shit, those alpine tales alluded to above?
*And we still accept in fact no abstraction what happened to all those zombies (the walking asleep as accompanying in Matthew 27: 52-53. The walking asleep are abandoned mentioned that once. Maybe Mark, Luke and John weren’t abhorrence fans. Anyway, conceivably they still drag about to this absolute day. By the way, if Jesus arose from the dead, doesn’t that accomplish him a zombie, one of the walking asleep too?
*Now if the complete a lot of atypical accident and angle in all of Christianity is the declared awakening of Jesus, the Son, event, afresh you’d accept to accept that the Master Planner (i.e. – God, the Father) would accept apparent to it that the complete affirmation for this was active and atheist-proof. Alas…
*If you analyze and adverse awful absurd but mutually absolute events, the one you adios is the greater unlikeliness of the two absurd events. For example, which is added unlikely, that anyone in fact died and rose afresh from the asleep (a awakening event) or that the data of the declared awakening accident were incorrect – the eyewitnesses were either lying and/or candidly mistaken.
THE SECOND COMING
*In accession to there getting lots of Biblical references to the day of the Lord is at duke or is abreast (Ezekiel 30: 3; Joel 1: 15; Joel 2: 1; Joel 3: 14; Obadiah 1: 15; Zephaniah 1: 7; Zephaniah 1: 14; Isaiah 13: 6; Matthew 3: 2; Matthew 4: 17; Matthew 10: 7; Book of 1 Thessalonians; and Book of 2 Thessalonians), the Gospels accomplish it bright that the Second Coming should accept happened by almost 100 AD / CE (Matthew 16: 28; Mark 9: 1; Luke 9: 27). So Jesus is now almost some 1900 years abaft schedule.
*Further, 100% of Second Coming prophecies accept been 100% wrong. That’s added than acceptable could cause to accept that the next apocalypse that comes abandoned (at rather common intervals too I ability add)…
*Finally, it’s accept to allocution to Jesus, but is Jesus answers or talks aback to you, methinks that something is able-bodied and absolutely aberrant somewhere.